Pakistanwap News

Will the history of India be rewritten?

Will the history of India be rewritten?
Will the history of India be rewritten?

Will the history of India be rewritten?

A detailed investigation by the Archaeological Department in the village of Cage Hadi (Kejhari), adjacent to the city of Madurai in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, has revealed that the confluence of the South India was 300 years older than the known period.

Cage Hadi is a small village 13 km southeast of Madurai. Archaeological excavations are underway here, from where the Vegai River flows at a distance of only two kilometers.

In 2014, archaeologists found evidence of a human population here almost 2,000 years ago.

A carbon dating test of coal found in Cage Hadi in 2017 confirmed that it had a human population of 200 BC.
Amarnath Ram Krishnan, the supervisor supervising the excavation site at Cage Hadi at the time, had applied for further research but was transferred to the northern Indian state of Assam.

Even after that, a survey by the state archeology department decided to continue the research work. On Thursday, the state government released a report based on the fourth phase of research in 2018.
What is the urban culture of Kajhari?
The six excavated items were sent to the US state of Florida for advanced testing, which revealed that they date from the sixth century BC to the third century BC. The test also found that objects found at a depth of 353 cm in Kajhari date back to 580 BC and objects found at a depth of 200 cm before 205 BC.

The historical period of Tamil Nadu dates back to 300 BC. It was believed that there was no urban civilization in Tamil Nadu at that time like the Gangetic plains but there is evidence from Kajhari to show that there were no civilizations in Tamil Nadu at that time like the plains of Kanga. I had urban culture.
The archeology department estimates that there was a large pottery industry there.

People were educated 2600 years ago

Experts believe that the Brahmi manuscripts date back to three centuries BC after a study of artifacts found in the Tamil Nadu villages of Kodonmal and Uzgankulam. But it has recently been revealed that the Brahmanical manuscripts recently found in Kajhari are six centuries old.

Now the Archaeological Department says that this proves that the people living in Kajhari 2600 years ago could read and write.

The archeology department has also found about 70 bones from the excavation site, of which 53% bones belong to animals like bulls, buffaloes, goats and cows. It also shows that these people also kept cattle.
The Brahmanical manuscripts are three centuries old

Researchers have found sand, iron and aluminum, as well as magnesium, in the shells of artifacts found there.

The oldest manuscripts ever found in India were of the Indus Valley and Bronze Age civilizations. Researchers believe that one of the methods of engraving was graffiti, which has been in use since the end of the Indus Valley Civilization. Graffiti or engraving also took place in the Bronze Age.

Most artefacts have carvings on one side of the vessel, and these carvings are made after the vessel is fully formed.

Archaeological excavations have uncovered two large pottery vessels at Kajhari, from which the archeological department estimates that a large pottery industry was established there.

Some bunker tools, jewelery pieces and pearls have also been recovered from Kajhari. Although excavators have found Kot Yin animals and 13 human dolls, 650 toy keys and 35 dots made of terra cotta, there is no indication of who the people of that time used to worship. That is, nothing related to worship was found.

For the first time, evidence of brick buildings has been found in Kajhari.

How old is the history of slavery in India?

The way history is being distorted these days is nothing new in history.

Now that they (Hindu nationalists) have a government, they want to present history in their own way. No history left. It has become a kind of myth.

Those who distort history and misrepresent it want to do two more things. One is to call Indian culture the oldest. Arya’s theory has been rejected in the world but here it is being acknowledged that Arya left India and we discovered everything first.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also seems to be saying that the elephant head of Ganesh (Hindu deity) shows that organ transplants were performed in ancient India.

Such was the attitude of the Nazis, who claimed that the Aryans had left Germany. The Nazis are being imitated in India in exactly the same way that the Aryans from India taught civilization to the whole world.
They date the beginning of the period of slavery in India as 700 AD to 1200 years of Muslim slavery and then to the British. These people do not see that if one has lived in India for many generations, he cannot be called the ruler of any other country.

The wealth of the country did not go out during his rule as it was drained of wealth during the British rule. Many English economists agree.
These people combine the rule of Britain and the Muslim rulers. Their purpose in doing so was that they had no support in the movement for independence from the British, so they extended the period of one and a half hundred years of slavery to 1200.

Doing so has two benefits for those who distort history. One of them is that they succeed in creating an atmosphere against Muslims.
Secondly, their role in the freedom movement is being covered up. He does not have a single hero in the national movement. Sometimes they adopt Sardar Patel, sometimes Bhagat Singh, but what do they have to do with Bhagat Singh.

So these people are trying to tell a story that has nothing to do with history.

It is clear that Padmavati is a fictional film but you will see that the Muslims were attacked because of the effect of this film.

The way Aladdin Khilji is being portrayed in Padmavati is not historically confirmed. If you had to make a film, there would be so many Rajput kings and queens and if there were many wars between them, you would make them. But you don’t want to do that.

The controversy over Padmavati shows that the caste system in India is still not abolished. It is being said that this is affecting the ‘Rajput dignity’. What is this Rajput Pride? On the one hand you say that caste is to be abolished and on the other hand such things?

I see films being made to provoke anti-Muslim sentiment.

Previous post: Mohammad Rafi:who ‘invented’ film singing

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Adblock Detected

Please Turn off Your Adblocker. We respect your privacy and time. We only display relevant and good legal ads. So please cooperate with us. We are thankful to you